DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FDI-23-797660·sf·FamilyLaw·Enforcement of Settlement
Hearing 2 months agoMOOT; hearing vacated.

Aaron Blake Hicks v. Bridget Marie Lee

Enforce Agreement Pursuant to CCP 664.6; Request for Family Code 271 Sanctions

Hearing date
Jun 25, 2026
Department
403
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAaron Blake Hicks
DefendantBridget Marie Lee

Ruling

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 AARON BLAKE HICKS,) Case Number: FDI-23-797660) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: June 25, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 BRIDGET MARIE LEE,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: BOBBY P. LUNA) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: ENFORCE AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO CCP 664.6; REQUEST FOR 13 FAMILY CODE SECTION 271 SANCTIONS 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 The parties submitted a stipulated judgment (on 6/22/26) incorporating the global settlement agreement 16 recited on the record at the 1/30/26 Settlement Conference, which the Court reviewed and approved. As 17 such, the Court finds Respondent’s Request for Order filed 4/29/26 seeking to enforce the settlement 18 agreement pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 is MOOT; therefore, the 6/25/26 hearing is 19 VACATED. No appearances are required on 6/25/26. 20

24

28

29

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share