Kelly Owen v. Brian Goshorn
Request for Order (support and attorney's fees)
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 July 30, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.
9. KELLY OWEN V. BRIAN GOSHORN 26FL0052
On April 1, 2026, Respondent filed a Request for Order (RFO) seeking support orders and attorney’s fees. He filed his Income and Expense Declaration concurrently therewith. All required documents were served on April 2nd.
On June 23, 2026, the parties filed a Judgment with an attached stipulation settling all issues. The court has not yet reviewed or signed the Judgment.
Given that the stipulation attached to the Judgment resolves the issues pending before the court, this matter is dropped from calendar as moot.
TENTATIVE RULING #9: GIVEN THAT THE STIPULATION ATTACHED TO THE JUDGMENT RESOLVES THE ISSUES PENDING BEFORE THE COURT, THIS MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR AS MOOT.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”