DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV166815·alameda·Civil·Partition by Sale
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

TAI vs TAI, et al.

Motion for Interlocutory Judgment of Partition by Sale, Appointment of Referee, Order for Immediate Sale and Request for Bifurcation

Hearing date
Jul 23, 2026
Department
512
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 10, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffShahida Tai

Ruling

26CV166815: TAI vs TAI, et al. 07/23/2026 Hearing on Motion for Order Motion for Interlocutory Judgment of Partition by Sale, Appointment of Referee, Order for Immediate Sale and Request for Bifurcation; filed by Shahida Tai (Plaintiff) CRS# 425795966047 in Department 512

Tentative Ruling - 07/22/2026 Elizabeth Riles

The Hearing on Motion for Order Motion for Interlocutory Judgment of Partition by Sale, Appointment of Referee, Order for Immediate Sale and Request for Bifurcation; filed by Shahida Tai (Plaintiff) CRS# 425795966047 scheduled for 07/23/2026 is continued to 09/10/2026 at 02:30 PM in Department 512 at Hayward Hall of Justice.

On Plaintiff Shahida Tai’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Interlocutory Judgment of Partition by Sale, Appointment of Referee, Order of Immediate Sale, and Request for Bifurcation (the “Motion for Partition”), the Court CONTINUES THE HEARING TO THURSDAY, 9/10/2026 at 2:30 p.m. in Dept. 512 to allow for the resolution of the Motion to Consolidate pending in a related probate action now in Dept. 103. The Court understands that the hearing on the Motion to Consolidate has been continued to 8/28/2026. Therefore, the Court sets a continued hearing date on the Motion for Partition by Sale far enough out to allow for the Motion to Consolidate to be decided.

CONTESTING TENTATIVE RULINGS

PLEASE NOTE: If any party contests the tentative ruling, the hearing on the motion will occur remotely via the court's own video-conferencing system.

Pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1308, subdivision (a)(1), this tentative ruling will become the order of the Court unless it is contested before 4:00 PM on the court day preceding the noticed hearing date.

To contest a tentative ruling, a party should do the following:

First, the party must notify Department 512, by email at Dept512@alameda.courts.ca.gov and copy all counsel of record and self-represented parties. The contesting party must state in the subject line of the email the case name, case number and motion.

Second, the party shall log into the eCourt Public Portal, search for this case (e.g., by case number), select the case name, select the "Tentative Rulings" tab, click the "Click to Contest this Ruling" button, enter the party's name and a brief statement of the party's reason for contesting the tentative, and click "Proceed."

Parties may appear via videoconference, using the Zoom.com website or application.

TO CONNECT TO ZOOM:

Join the meeting using the following link: https://www.zoomgov.com/j/16057661931 26CV166815: TAI vs TAI, et al. 07/23/2026 Hearing on Motion for Order Motion for Interlocutory Judgment of Partition by Sale, Appointment of Referee, Order for Immediate Sale and Request for Bifurcation; filed by Shahida Tai (Plaintiff) CRS# 425795966047 in Department 512 Join the meeting by Phone:

Meeting ID: 160 5766 1931

1 669 254 5252, 16057661931# US (San Jose) 1 669 216 1590, 16057661931# US (San Jose) 833 568 8864 US Toll-free

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share