DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
30-2026-01575193·orange·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing about 2 months agoSUSTAINED with leave to amend

Wonder vs. Westbrook

Defendant’s Demurrer to the Complaint

Hearing date
Jul 22, 2026
Department
C61
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffWonder
DefendantWestbrook

Ruling

Superior Court of the State of California County of Orange TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR C61 HON. JENNIFER M. MCCARTNEY

Date: 7/22/2026 Courtroom Rules and Notices

The Court will continue to upload tentative rulings as they are completed. Please be sure to keep checking until 8:30 AM on the day of your hearing.

Written responses, oppositions, or filings that are filed later than 12:15 PM the day before the hearing on the motion will go on second call by the Court for the Court to have an opportunity to review any lastminute filings. If a party files a written response, opposition, or any filing after 12:15 PM on the day before the hearing, the party must ensure they are available for the court's afternoon calendar the day of the hearing.

Submitting on tentative rulings: If all counsel intend to submit on the tentative ruling and do not desire oral argument, please advise the Courtroom Clerk or Courtroom Attendant by calling (657) 622-5261 – both counsel need to state they are submitting on the tentative. Please do not call the Department unless all parties submit to the tentative ruling. If all sides submit on the tentative ruling and so advise the Court, the tentative ruling shall become the Court’s final ruling, and the prevailing party shall give notice of the ruling and prepare an order for the Court’s signature if appropriate under Cal. R. Ct. 3.1312.

Non-appearances: If nobody appears for the hearing and the Court has not been notified that all parties submit on the tentative ruling, the Court shall determine whether the matter is taken off calendar or the tentative ruling becomes the final ruling. The Court also might make a different order at the hearing. (Lewis v. Fletcher Jones Motor Cars, Inc. (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 436, 442, fn. 1.)

# Case Name Tentative 6 30-2026-01575193 The Court has read and considered the Defendant’s Demurrer to the Wonder vs. Westbrook Complaint (ROA 7) and the Complaint (ROA 2).

The Court SUSTAINS the Demurrer with leave to amend. The Complaint states, under #9a, that the Defendant was served with a 3-day notice to pay rent or quit and a 3-day notice to quit under Civil Code §1946.2(c). No such notices are attached to the Complaint. Additionally, no proof of service is attached to the Complaint.

The Court orders that the Plaintiff has 5 business days to amend the complaint.

The Court Clerk is to serve notice on the parties.

7 30-2026-01581377 The Court has read and considered the Defendant’s Demurrer to the EJM Capital, LLC vs. Complaint (ROA 7) and the Complaint (ROA 2). Ceja When a party files a demurrer, the Court looks at the facial sufficiency of the complaint and attachments only and cannot consider extrinsic evidence. The

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share