DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25677694·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing about 1 month ago

AH HOUSING PRESERVATION, LP. VS. DEMONTE DAVIS ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Breach Of Stipulation Of Settlement Under Ccp 664.6; Motion For Reclassification Of Jurisdiction To Limited Civil Over $10,000

Hearing date
Jul 20, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$10,000

Parties

PlaintiffAH HOUSING PRESERVATION, LP.
DefendantDEMONTE DAVIS

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25677694 - July 20, 2026 Hearing date: July 20, 2026 Case number: CUD25677694 Case title: AH HOUSING PRESERVATION, LP. VS. DEMONTE DAVIS ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25677694 | Case Title: | | AH HOUSING PRESERVATION, LP. VS. DEMONTE DAVIS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-20 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Breach Of Stipulation Of Settlement Under Ccp 664.6; Motion For Reclassification Of Jurisdiction To Limited Civil Over $10,000; Declarations Of Reyanthony Panlilio, And Allison Brodbeck In Support Thereof, Proposed Order, And Judgment |

Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 20, 2026. Line PLAINTIFF AH HOUSING PRESERVATION, LP. Notice Of Motion And Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Breach Of Stipulation Of Settlement Under Ccp 664.6; Motion For Reclassification Of Jurisdiction To Limited Civil Over $10,000; Declarations Of Reyanthony Panlilio, And Allison Brodbeck In Support Thereof, Proposed Order, And Judgment | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share