Motion to Correct Clerical Error in Judgment
In re: Jerry McKibben and Karen Tallent Trust, 16PR-0352
Hearing: Motion to Correct Clerical Error in Judgment
Date: July 22, 2026
Notice of Petitioner’s Motion to Correct Clerical Error in Judgment (Motion) is deficient. On March 30, 2026, Petitioner electronically served Respondent and other parties with Notice of Hearing of the Motion. (Proof of Service filed 3/30/2026.) Respondent is self-represented. Electronic service on a self-represented litigant is prohibited under California Rules of Court, rule 2.251(c)(3)(B), unless the self-represented party has “affirmatively consent[ed] to electronic service.”
The Court notes that Respondent may serve parties who are represented by legal counsel electronically and does not consent to electronic service by doing so. At a June 10, 2026, hearing in this case Respondent confirmed that she has not consented to receiving electronic service.
The motion will be continued accordingly.
ORDER
The motion is continued to October 21, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in D4.
Petitioner’s counsel should review notice for any future motions to ensure notice has been properly provided.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”