Paez v. Singh
Plaintiffs’ Petitions for Compromise of Minors’ Claims of Giovanni Iker Paez and Adrian Christopher Paez
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
(03) Tentative Ruling
Re: Paez v. Singh Case No. 26CECG01083
Hearing Date: July 9, 2026 (Dept. 501)
Motion: Plaintiffs’ Petitions for Compromise of Minors’ Claims of Giovanni Iker Paez and Adrian Christopher Paez
Tentative Ruling:
To grant the petitions to approve the compromise of the minors’ claims of Giovanni Iker Paez and Adrian Christopher Paez. (Code Civ. Proc., §372; Probate Code, §§ 3500, 3600-3613.) The proposed orders have been signed. The matter is off calendar. No appearances are necessary.
The court sets a status conference for Thursday, September 10, 2026 at 3:30 pm., in Department 501, for confirmation of deposit of the minor’s funds into a blocked account. If Petitioner files the Acknowledgment of Receipt of Order and Funds for Deposit in Blocked Account (MC-356) at least five court days before the hearing, the status conference will come off calendar.
Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.
Tentative Ruling
Issued By: KCK on 07/07/26. (Judge’s initials) (Date)
8
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”