DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
22CV-00719·merced·Civil·Contract
Hearing about 2 months agoMatter will be heard with conditions for good cause

Pacific Southwest Irrigation Corp. vs Jose Rodriguez

Ex Parte to Continue Trial Date; Order Shortening Time

Hearing date
Jul 17, 2026
Department
8
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Ex Parte Application rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPacific Southwest Irrigation Corp.
DefendantJose Rodriguez

Ruling

Hon. Stephanie L. Jamieson Courtroom 8

627 W. 21st Street, Merced

Friday, July 17, 2026 10:00 a.m.

The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725-4240 to notify the court of your intent to appear.

2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. Note: Notifying CourtCall (the court’s telephonic appearance provider) of your intent to appear does not satisfy the requirement of notifying the court.

Case No. Title / Description

22CV-00719 Pacific Southwest Irrigation Corp. vs Jose Rodriguez

Ex Parte [Unopposed] to Continue Trial Date and Corresponding Deadlines; Or Alternatively, For an Order Shortening Time on Motion to Continue Trial Date and All Associated Trial Deadlines

The court notes that no trial dates are available until 2028. However, the court will hear arguments, and if good cause is shown, the dates may be vacated if the parties enter a stipulation to extend the five (5) year statutory deadline to September 2028. At that time a trial setting conference will be set for a date far enough out that allows for the parties to determine if this matter is going to settle.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share