DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL0001985·marin·FamilyLaw·Family Law
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Jennifer White Kelly v. William Shuttler Wick

Motion – Relieve Counsel

Hearing date
Jul 17, 2026
Department
E
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerJennifer White Kelly
RespondentWilliam Shuttler Wick

Attorneys

Dana Marie Rueckert-Resman(Kaspar & Lugay, LLP)for Respondent
Brooke Brewer(Kaspar & Lugay, LLP)for Respondent

Ruling

This matter is set for hearing on the Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Respondent William Shuttler Wick, filed by Dana Marie Rueckert-Resman and Brooke Brewer, Esqs. of Kaspar & Lugay, LLP on 5/18/2026. The Motion is accompanied by a supporting Declaration of Brooke Brewer, Esq.

1. Finding good cause for the same, Counsels’ Motion is granted. The Order Granting Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel was signed and entered on 5/19/2026.

SO ORDERED.

Any party who disagrees with the Court's tentative ruling and wishes to have oral argument must notify the Court at (415) 444-7046 and opposing counsel (or if the opposing party is selfrepresented, notice must be given directly to the opposing party) of their intent to appear at the hearing for oral argument by 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, as required by Marin County Superior Court Family Law Local Rules 7.12(B) and (C). Notice may be given by telephone or in person. Absent proper notice, no oral argument will be permitted. If no request for oral argument is made, the tentative ruling will become the order of the Court.

Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, persons who requested oral argument must appear for the hearing in person or remotely via Zoom, in accordance with the Court website guidelines. If appearing remotely via Zoom (video or telephone), you are responsible for ensuring you have adequate connectivity; the Court may proceed in a party’s absence if technical issues arise. Proper Zoom etiquette and courtroom decorum are required, and failure to comply may result in the hearing being halted and an order to appear in person being made.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share