DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CV02903·butte·Civil·Employment/Contract
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

Salvagno, Rachelle v. Tri Counties Bank

Defendant’s Renewed Motion to Compel Responses to Written Discovery and Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Jun 10, 2026
Department
Law & Motion
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$2,705.00

Parties

PlaintiffSalvagno, Rachelle
DefendantTri Counties Bank

Ruling

11. 23CV02903 Salvagno, Rachelle v. Tri Counties Bank

EVENT: Defendant’s Renewed Motion to Compel Responses to Written Discovery and Monetary Sanctions

Defendants Renewed Motion to Compel Responses to Written Discovery and Monetary Sanctions is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to provide verified responses without objection within 10 days’ notice of this order. Although the Court is mindful of the explanations from Plaintiff concerning the delays in responding, ultimately those explanations do not excuse a delay of this length, considering the requests were served in December 2025. As a result, Plaintiff is sanctioned in the amount of $2,705.00, payable within 30 days. Defendant shall prepare a form of order consistent with this ruling within two weeks.

12. 25CV01086 Robinson, Lorilee Meranda v. Transdev Services, Inc.

EVENT: Defendant’s Motion for an Order Deeming Matters Admitted and for Monetary Sanctions

Defendant’s Motion for an Order Deeming Matters Admitted and for Monetary Sanctions is GRANTED. It is well settled that unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all. (Melendrez v. Superior Court (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 1343, 1348) Plaintiff (but not Plaintiff’s counsel) is sanctioned in the amount of $1,428.00, payable within 30 days. The Court will sign the proposed order with this modification.

13. 25CV03376 Li, Yi v. AMCAL Chico LLC et al.

EVENT: Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint

Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint is DENIED. CCP 1005 requires a minimum of 16 court days’ notice. An additional 2 court days are required when service is effectuated electronically as occurred here. (CCP 1010.6(a)(3)(B))

5|Page

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share