DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV139713·alameda·Civil·Public Nuisance / Enforcement
Hearing about 2 months agoThe Court does not designate this case as complex.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACTING BY AND THROUGH OAKLAND CITY ATTORNEY RYAN RICHARDSON, et al. vs MAISEL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC., et al.

Complex Determination Hearing

Hearing date
Jul 16, 2026
Department
21
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PlaintiffRYAN RICHARDSON
DefendantMAISEL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC.

Ruling

25CV139713: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACTING BY AND THROUGH OAKLAND CITY ATTORNEY RYAN RICHARDSON, et al. vs MAISEL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC., et al. 07/16/2026 Complex Determination Hearing in Department 21

Tentative Ruling - 07/15/2026 S. Raj Chatterjee

ORDER RE: COMPLIANCE

The Court has ordered the following after review of the case.

The Court does not designate this case as complex. The parties will receive notice of a case management conference in another civil department. Any complex fees paid for or by the parties prior to the order shall be reimbursed in the amount paid pursuant to Government Code Section 70616(c).

The case will remain in Department 23.

The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share