DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
30-2025-01456606·orange·Civil·Case Management / Counsel Withdrawal
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

Mackey vs. Packnit

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record

Hearing date
Jul 16, 2026
Department
C34
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Attorneys

Marc Lazo(K&L Law Group, P.C.)for Plaintiff

Ruling

TENTATIVE RULINGS

Date: July 16, 2026

# Case Name Tentative

1. 30-2025-01456606 1. Case Management Conference 2. Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record Mackey vs. Packnit Marc Lazo of K&L Law Group, P.C. (“Moving Attorney”) moves to be relieved as counsel of record for plaintiff Daniel Mackey.

The hearing on this motion was continued from May 14, 2026 to July 16, 2026 and Moving Attorney was ordered to provide updated proofs of service to the Court on or before the hearing date showing that Plaintiff was properly served with the moving papers either by mail or email and, if service was by email, provide a supplemental declaration stating that the electronic service address is the client’s current electronic service address as required by rule. 3.1362(d)(2).

The updated proofs of service and/or supplemental declaration have not been filed as ordered. Thus, because Moving Attorney has failed to show that service of the moving papers was proper, the motion is DENIED without prejudice.

Moving Attorney to give notice.

2. 30-2025-01489384 1. Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record

Youssef vs. Andrawos Bruce A. Wilson (“Moving Attorney”/ “MA”)) moves to be relieved as counsel of record for Defendant Christin Andrawos.

The motion is unopposed. Moving Attorney has stated a basis for permissive withdrawal under Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.16. The motion satisfies the notice, declaration, and proposed order requirements of Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362.

The motion is GRANTED. This will take effect upon filing of a proof of service showing this order has been served on MA’s client.

***The Court will interlineate Paragraph 8 of the Proposed Order with the hearing date on the Motion to Compel Answers to Special Interrogatories scheduled for 11/19/26 at 1:30 p.m. in Department C34.

Moving Attorney to give notice.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share