DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV2697·eldorado·Civil·Case Management
Hearing in about 3 hoursGRANTED

MILLER v. HAEN CONSTRUCTORS, ET AL.

Motion for Attorney Withdrawal

Hearing date
Aug 21, 2026
Department
12
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Oct 20, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMiller
DefendantHaen Constructors

Attorneys

R. Parker Whitefor Plaintiff

Ruling

LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR AUGUST 21, 2026

4. MILLER v. HAEN CONSTRUCTORS, ET AL., 25CV2697

Motion for Attorney Withdrawal

This matter was continued from August 14, 2026. Due to a widespread power

outage in the South Lake Tahoe, California, area on August 13, 2026, the court was

unable to post its Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings for the August 14, 2026,

calendar until the morning of the hearing.

Prior to the hearing, plaintiff requested a continuance. The court continued the

hearing to August 21, 2026.

On July 2, 2026, plaintiff’s attorney, R. Parker White, filed a motion to be relieved as

counsel.

On August 11, 2026, plaintiff filed an untimely response, which the court has read

and considered.

The court grants counsel’s motion to withdraw from the case. The court, on its own

motion, will continue the Case Management Conference (currently set for

September 8, 2026) to October 20, 2026, to allow plaintiff additional time to retain

another attorney.

TENTATIVE RULING # 4:

(A) PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW IS GRANTED. COUNSEL’S

WITHDRAWAL WILL BE EFFECTIVE AS OF THE DATE OF FILING PROOF OF SERVICE

OF THE FORMAL, SIGNED ORDER UPON THE CLIENT.

(B) THE COURT, ON ITS OWN MOTION, CONTINUES THE CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE (CURRENTLY SET FOR SEPTEMBER 8, 2026) TO 11:30 A.M., TUESDAY,

OCTOBER 20, 2026, IN DEPARTMENT 12.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD (LEWIS v. SUPERIOR COURT (1999) 19

CAL.4TH 1232, 1247), UNLESS A NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR AND REQUEST ORAL

LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR AUGUST 21, 2026

ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR

BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 573-3042 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE

TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF AN INTENT TO APPEAR

MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SAID NOTICE

MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share