DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
22CV404542·santaclara·Civil·Minor's Compromise
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

Nora Emadi et al. v. Essex Property Trust Inc. et al.

Application for minor's compromise

Hearing date
Jul 16, 2026
Department
10
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffNora Emadi
DefendantEssex Property Trust Inc.

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2210

DATE: July 16, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, you must call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

9:01 A.M. LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING Line 1 26CV490295 Capital One, N.A., Defendant Berenisse Ruiz’s request for a fee waiver. The court Successor by Merger to denied defendant’s initial fee waiver request because the reported Discover Bank v. gross monthly income of $5,707.14 substantially exceeded the Berenisse Ruiz reported monthly expenses of $2,739.44. Defendant’s FW-006 request states that the initial fee waiver application involved “temporarily higher” income. Defendant does not persuasively explain why defendant reported incorrect information on the initial fee waiver.

Defendant is ordered to file new FW-001 and FW-003 forms with accurate, updated financial information demonstrating eligibility for a fee waiver. The court’s decision on the fee waiver is deferred until those update forms are filed. Line 2 22CV404542 Nora Emadi et al. v. Application for minor’s compromise. Parties ordered to appear. Essex Property Trust Inc. et al.

- oo0oo -

5

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share