DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26STCV00816·la·Civil·Minor's Compromise
Hearing todayCONTINUED

Denia Aguiera, et al. v. 630 Sepulveda, LLC, et al.

Petition to Approve Minor's Compromise

Hearing date
Aug 20, 2026
Department
732
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Monetary amounts referenced

$100,000.00$97,500.00$2,500.00$625$1,875.00$5,000

Parties

PlaintiffDenia Aguilera
PlaintiffAutumn Chrtntena Buchanan
Defendant630 Sepulveda, LLC
DefendantWeststar Property Management Inc.

Ruling

Denia Aguiera, et al. v. 630 Sepulveda, LLC, et al. Thursday, August 20, 2026 | CASE NUMBER: 26STCV00816 UNOPPOSED ___________________________________________________________________ Plaintiff Denia Aguilera's Petition to Approve Minor's Compromise for Claimant Autumn Chrtntena Buchanan ___________________________________________________________________

Facts: This is a motor vehicle negligence action. The First Amended Complaint ("FAC") alleges as follows. Plaintiffs Denia Aguilera and Autumn Chrtntena Buchanan ("Plaintiffs") leased residential property from Defendants 630 Sepulveda, LLC and Weststar Property Management Inc. ("Defendants"). (FAC P.P. 15-19.) Defendants have permitted various defective conditions to persist on the property rendering it uninhabitable despite complaints from Plaintiffs. (FAC P.P. 21-22.)

Procedural History: Plaintiffs filed the original Complaint on January 9, 2026, and filed the FAC on June 24, 2026, alleging ten causes of action: 1. Breach of Statutory Warranty of Habitability 2. Breach of Tortious Warranty of Habitability 3. Breach of Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment 4. Breach of Contract 5. Negligence 6. Negligent Hiring and Supervision 7. Private Nuisance 8. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress 9. LAMC Sec. 45.33 10. Unfair Competition

Plaintiffs filed the present petition to approve minor's compromise on July 23, 2026.

Analysis

I. PETITION FOR MINOR'S COMPROMISE

Minors or people without legal capacity to make decisions must appear in court by a guardian or conservator of the estate, or guardian ad litem. (Code Civ. Proc. Sec. 372, subd. (a)(1).) Such person appearing in court on behalf of the minor or person without capacity has the power to compromise the claims of the represented person, "with the approval of the court." (Ibid.)

The requirement of court approval exists "to protect the best interests of the minor." (Pearson v. Superior Court (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 1333, 1338.) "A petition for court approval of a compromise of, or a covenant not to sue or enforce judgment on, a minor's disputed claim; a compromise or settlement of a pending action or proceeding to which a minor or person with a disability is a party; or the disposition of the proceeds of a judgment for a minor or person with a disability under Probate Code sections 3500 and 3600-3613 or Code of Civil Procedure section 372 must be verified by the petitioner and must contain a full disclosure of all information that has any bearing on the reasonableness of the compromise, covenant, settlement, or disposition." (CRC Rule 7.950.)

If an attorney assisted in the preparation of the petition, the petition must disclose: "(1) The name, state bar number, law firm, if any, and business address of the attorney; (2) Whether the attorney became involved with the petition, directly or indirectly, at the instance of any party against whom the claim is asserted or of any party's insurance carrier; (3) Whether the attorney represents or is employed by any other party or any insurance carrier involved in the matter; (4) Whether the attorney has received any attorney's fees or other compensation for services provided in connection with the claim giving rise to the petition or with the preparation of the petition, and, if so, the amounts and the identity of the person who paid the fees or other compensation; (5) If the attorney has not received any attorney's fees or other compensation for services provided in connection with the claim giving rise to the petition or with the preparation of the petition, whether the attorney expects to receive any fees or other compensation for these services, and, if so, the amounts and the identity of the person who is expected to pay the fees or other compensation; and (6) The terms of any agreement between the petitioner and the attorney." (CRC Rule 7.951.)

The petitioner and claimant must attend the hearing on the petition unless the court for good cause orders otherwise. (CRC Rule 7.952, subd. (a).)

In all cases under Code of Civil Procedure section 372 or Probate Code sections 3600-3601, unless the court has approved the fee agreement in advance, the court must use a reasonable fee standard when approving and allowing the amount of attorney's fees payable from money or property paid or to be paid for the benefit of a minor or a person with a disability. The court must give consideration to the terms of any representation agreement made between the attorney and the representative of the minor or person with a disability and must evaluate the agreement based on the facts and circumstances existing at the time the agreement was made, except where the attorney and the representative of the minor or person with a disability contemplated that the attorney's fee would be affected by later events. (CRC Rule 7.955, subd. (a)(1)-(2).)

Plaintiff Denia Aguilera ("Plaintiff") seeks approval of a settlement for minor Claimant Autumn Chrtntena Buchanan ("Claimant") as follows. The total settlement to be paid from Defendants 630 Sepulveda, LLC and Weststar Property Management Inc. ("Defendants") is $100,000.00, to be apportioned $97,500.00 for Plaintiff, and $2,500.00 for Claimant. (Petition at p. 3.) The basis for this apportionment is that the habitability conditions at issue caused Plaintiff to lose wages, rent, and out of pocket expenses, which were not incurred by the minor claimant. (Petition Att. 11b(6).)

From the $2,500.00 apportioned to Claimant, 25% -- $625 -- is apportioned to attorney fees. (Petition at p. 5.) This leaves a net settlement amount of $1,875.00 for Claimant, to be delivered to Plaintiff without bond pursuant to Probate Code Sec.Sec. 3401 and 3402. (Petition at p. 8.)

The motion is accompanied by a declaration of Plaintiffs' counsel, who attests to the work performed on this case, their qualifications, and the factors described in CRC Rule 7.955, subd. (b). (Yenokian Decl. P.P. 1-12.) Counsel presents the retainer agreement with a 45% contingency fee, which he has discounted to 25% for Claimant. (Petition Att. 17a.) Counsel states that he spent 60 to 65 hours of attorney work on the present action since he commenced the representation in July 2025. (Yenokian Decl. P.P. 2, 6.)

The settlement apportionment and fees are reasonable in light of the materials presented. However, insufficient materials are presented to authorize disposition of the settlement proceeds to Plaintiff under Probate Code.Sec. 3401 and 3402. Probate Code Sec. 3401 states: Where a minor does not have a guardian of the estate, money or other property belonging to the minor may be paid or delivered to a parent of the minor entitled to the custody of the minor to be held in trust for the minor until the minor reaches majority if the requirements of subdivision (c) are satisfied. ... (c) This section applies only if both of the following requirements are satisfied: (1) The total estate of the minor, including the money and other property to be paid or delivered to the parent, does not exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000) in value. (2) The parent to whom the money or other property is to be paid or delivered gives the person making the payment or delivery written assurance, verified by the oath of such parent, that the total estate of the minor, including the money or other property to be paid or delivered to the parent, does not exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000) in value. (Code Civ.

Proc. Sec. 3401, subd. (a), (c).)

The present petition contains no assurance that the estate of the minor is less than $5,000.00. Hearing on the present petition is therefore CONTINUED to permit Plaintiff to file the requisite verified assurance under Probate Code Sec. 3401.

Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Department 732 DENIA AGUILERA, et al. Plaintiffs v. 630 SEPULVEDA, LLC, et al., Defendants. | Case No.:

Hearing Date: August 20, 2026 [TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Plaintiff Denia Aguilera's Petition to Approve Minor's Compromise for Claimant Autumn Chrtntena Buchanan | Plaintiff Denia Aguilera's Petition to Approve Minor's Compromise for Claimant Autumn Chrtntena Buchanan is CONTINUED to permit Plaintiff to file the requisite verified assurance under Probate Code Sec. 3401. Plaintiffs to give notice. Dated: August 20, 2026 _________________________________________ Hon. Richard S. Kemalyan Judge of the Superior Court | Home -->)" -->

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share