Motion to Deem Request for Admissions Admitted
24CV026013: SYNCHRONY BANK vs SEARCY, et al. 07/15/2026 Hearing on Motion to Deem Request for Admissions Admitted in Department 8D
Tentative Ruling
NOTICE:
Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure:
To request limited oral argument, on any matter on this calendar, you must call the Department 8D Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-7719 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice mail message: a) identifying themselves as the party requesting oral argument; b) indicating the specific matter/motion for which they are requesting oral argument; and c) confirming that it has notified the opposing party of its intention to appear and that opposing party may appear via Zoom using the Zoom link and Meeting ID indicated below.
If no request for oral argument is made, the tentative ruling becomes the final order of the Court. Unless ordered to appear in person by the Court, parties may appear remotely either telephonically or by video conference via the Zoom video/audio conference platform with notice to the Court and all other parties in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure §367.75. Although remote participation is not required, the Court will presume all parties are appearing remotely for non-evidentiary civil hearings.
The Department 8D Zoom Link is https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16113421868 and the Zoom Meeting ID is 161 1342 1868. To appear on Zoom telephonically, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the Zoom Meeting ID referenced above. NO COURTCALL APPEARANCES WILL BE ACCEPTED.
Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government code §68086 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956. Requirements for requesting a court reporter are listed on the Court Reporter Services webpage available on the Sacramento Superior Court website at https://saccourt.ca.gov/general-information/court-reporter-services-transcripts. Parties may contact Court- Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the list of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore available at https://saccourt.ca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/227/639084034465370000.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
A Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Courts Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list.
24CV026013: SYNCHRONY BANK vs SEARCY, et al. 07/15/2026 Hearing on Motion to Deem Request for Admissions Admitted in Department 8D
Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk. If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will forward the form to the Court Reporters Office and an official reporter will be provided.
TENTATIVE RULING:
Plaintiff Synchrony Banks (Plaintiff) motion for order that matters in request for admission be deemed admitted against Defendant Eric Searcy (Defendant) is UNOPPOSED and GRANTED, unless Defendant serves, before the hearing on the motion, proposed responses that are in substantial compliance with Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.220. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2033.280(c).) If substantial compliance occurs before the hearing, the parties are required to contest this tentative pursuant to Local Rule 1.06(D) and appear at hearing to inform the court. If such appearance does not occur, the Court will presume no such substantial compliance has occurred, and the motion will be granted.
On July 21, 2025, Plaintiff served Defendant, by mail, with its first set of requests for admission. (DAnna Decl. ¶ 2, Exhibit 1.) To date, no responses have been served upon Plaintiff. (Id. at ¶ 3.) Plaintiff now moves the Court for an order to deem facts admitted.
No opposition to the motion was filed. A partys failure to oppose a motion is construed as a concession on the merits of the motion. (See, e.g., D.I. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Superior Court (1964) 60 Cal.2d 723, 728, fn. 4.) Plaintiff has not requested sanctions.
Plaintiff shall serve notice of this order on Defendant and file proof of service within five days of this order.
The minute order is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 or other notice is required.