Estate of Jo Ellen Francis

discussions into subsequent sections of the statement, but may instead simply refer to them by, for example, “See Discussion at P:L-L, above.’

Ms. Scheuner may, no later than July 30, 2026, file and serve a responsive separate statement. Because the Court does not weigh the evidence on an anti-SLAPP Motion, the responsive separate statement should be limited to citing evidence, if any, that Ms. Scheuner contends negates RORE’s purported showing as a matter of law.

PROBATE CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Estate of Jo Ellen Francis 25PR000061

FIRST ACCOUNT AND REPORT OF STATUS; PETITION TO CONTINUE ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATE; AND FOR APPOINTMENT OF SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO DECEDENT’S TRUST

TENTATIVE RULING: The Petition is GRANTED. The matter is set for a Status Hearing Re: Final Distribution on July 15, 2027, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B.

The petition to appoint successor trustee is GRANTED.

CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Integon National Insurance Company v. Andrew Madison 26CV000413 Mackenzie-Davis et al

DEFENDANT BRYSON HALL’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

TENTATIVE RULING: The demurrer is OVERRULED. Hall is granted 10 days’ leave to answer the Complaint. (See Rules of Court, rule 3.1320(g).)

The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notice of the Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of hearing, made by any party who represents it did not timely receive the required notice, regardless of whether or not moving party is present at the hearing.

A. PROCEDURAL MATTER

24