DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2015-1-CV-284282·santaclara·Civil·Post-judgment proceedings
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

J. Arvizu et al. v. P. Oliver

Motion to amend judgment; motion to amend assignment order; motion for post-judgment attorney fees and costs

Hearing date
Jul 14, 2026
Department
10
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Tax Costs rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$7,350.54$6,620$730.54

Parties

PlaintiffJ. Arvizu
DefendantP. Oliver

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2210

DATE: July 14, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, you must call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

Line 7 2015-1-CV- J. Arvizu et al. v. P. Plaintiffs’ motion to amend the judgment to add Dynamic Home 284282 Oliver strategies, LLC, as an alter ego of the judgment debtor; issue an amended assignment order; and award post-judgment attorney fees and costs. Notice is proper and the motion is unopposed. Plaintiffs’ counsel is admonished to comply with the line-spacing requirements of Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2.108 in future filings—substantial portions of the memorandum of points and authorities were single-spaced.

On good cause shown, the motion amend the judgment is GRANTED. The motion to amend the assignment order is GRANTED. The motion for post-judgment attorney fees and costs is GRANTED in the amount of $7,350.54 (for the period from December 2024 to December 2025, consisting of $6,620 in attorney fees (16/55 hours at $400/hour) and $730.54 in costs). Moving party to submit proposed order.

- oo0oo -

9:01 A.M. LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING Line 1 25CV462661 State Farm Mutual Defense counsel motion to be relieved. Parties ordered to appear. Automobile Insurance Company v. Juan Zuniga

- oo0oo -

3

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share