DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682114·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED, pursuant to the mandatory provision of CCP 473(b). The default and default judgment entered on June 3, 2026 are set aside and vacated. The writ issued on June 17, 2026 is recalled. Defendant Marlon Bishop shall file and serve the proposed answer within five days. Eviction Defense Collaborative is ordered to pay Plaintiff $395 as reasonable compensatory legal fees and costs.

GEARY COURTYARD 639 LLC VS. MARLON BISHOP ET AL

MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT/LEAVE TO DEFEND

Hearing date
Jul 14, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$395

Parties

PlaintiffGEARY COURTYARD 639 LLC
DefendantMARLON BISHOP

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday, July 14, 2026, line 8. DEFENDANT MARLON BISHOP MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT/LEAVE TO DEFEND. GRANTED, pursuant to the mandatory provision of CCP 473(b). The default and default judgment entered on June 3, 2026 are set aside and vacated. The writ issued on June 17, 2026 is recalled. Defendant Marlon Bishop shall file and serve the proposed answer within five days. Eviction Defense Collaborative is ordered to pay Plaintiff $395 as reasonable compensatory legal fees and costs. = (501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share