DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24618659·sf·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED in part and DENIED in part

LIUDMILA NAUMIK VS. FLORA ANDREA AUGUSTIN ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Defendant Sergio Lopez Rodriguea Dba Sergio Lopez Roofing To Provide Further Responses To Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, And Requests For Admission, Set One; And For Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 14, 2026
Department
301
Judge
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLIUDMILA NAUMIK
DefendantFLORA ANDREA AUGUSTIN
DefendantSERGIO LOPEZ RODRIGUEA DBA SERGIO LOPEZ ROOFING

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC24618659 - July 14, 2026 Hearing date: July 14, 2026 Case number: CGC24618659 Case title: LIUDMILA NAUMIK VS. FLORA ANDREA AUGUSTIN ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24618659 | Case Title: | | LIUDMILA NAUMIK VS. FLORA ANDREA AUGUSTIN ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-14 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Defendant Sergio Lopez Rodriguea Dba Sergio Lopez Roofing To Provide Further Responses To Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, And Requests For Admission, Set One; And For Monetary Sanctions; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof | Rulings: | | Matter on the Law & Motion/Discovery Calendar for Tuesday, July 14, 2026, line 3, PLAINTIFF LIUDMILA NAUMIK Motion To Compel Defendant Sergio Lopez Rodriguea Dba Sergio Lopez Roofing To Provide Further Responses To Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, And Requests For Admission, Set One; And For Monetary Sanctions

Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses is granted in part and denied in part. *THE COURT'S FULL AND COMPLETE TENTATIVE RULING HAS BEEN EMAILED TO COUNSEL*

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. = (302/CM) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share