DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2025CUWE052753·ventura·Civil·Civil Litigation
Hearing about 2 months agoDemurrer SUSTAINED with leave to amend on 9th cause of action only. Motion to Strike GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND.

KYLA DE LEON vs SIOBHAN O’DONNELL

Defendant Siobhan O’Donnell’s Demurrer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint; Defendant Siobhan O’Donnell’s Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint

Hearing date
Jul 7, 2026
Department
41
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffKyla De Leon
DefendantSiobhan O’Donnell

Ruling

2025CUWE052753: KYLA DE LEON vs SIOBHAN O'DONNELL 07/07/2026 in Department 41 Demurrer to First Amended Complaint

Kyla DeLeon v. Siobhan O’Donnell

July 7, 2026; at 8:20 a.m. Department 41 (L. Jones)

Motion: 1. Defendant Siobhan O’Donnell’s Demurrer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Opposed)

2. Defendant Siobhan O’Donnell’s Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Opposed)

Defendant Siobhan O’Donnell’s Demurrer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint per Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subdivision (e) is SUSTAINED. Insufficient facts are stated to support the causes of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress (seventh cause of action) and violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200 (ninth cause of action). Leave to amend will only be allowed on the ninth cause of action. (Goodman v. Kennedy (1976) 18 Cal.3d. 335, 349; Okun v. Sup.Ct. (Maple Properties) (1981) 29 Cal.3d. 442, 460; and Bounds v. Sup.Ct. (KMA Group) (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 468, 484.)

Defendant Siobhan O’Donnell’s Motion to Strike Portions of the First Amended Complaint is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND per Code of Civil Procedure sections 435 et seq. There are insufficient facts stated to support a claim for punitive damages. Accordingly, the motion to strike will be granted without leave to amend, especially in light of the ruling on the demurrer.

Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 20 days of this Court’s order.

Notice of this Court’s ruling to be given by counsel for Defendant.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share