Defendant Siobhan O’Donnell’s Demurrer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint; Defendant Siobhan O’Donnell’s Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint
2025CUWE052753: KYLA DE LEON vs SIOBHAN O'DONNELL 07/07/2026 in Department 41 Demurrer to First Amended Complaint
Kyla DeLeon v. Siobhan ODonnell
July 7, 2026; at 8:20 a.m. Department 41 (L. Jones)
Motion: 1. Defendant Siobhan ODonnells Demurrer to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (Opposed)
2. Defendant Siobhan ODonnells Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (Opposed)
Defendant Siobhan ODonnells Demurrer to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint per Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subdivision (e) is SUSTAINED. Insufficient facts are stated to support the causes of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress (seventh cause of action) and violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200 (ninth cause of action). Leave to amend will only be allowed on the ninth cause of action. (Goodman v. Kennedy (1976) 18 Cal.3d. 335, 349; Okun v. Sup.Ct. (Maple Properties) (1981) 29 Cal.3d. 442, 460; and Bounds v. Sup.Ct. (KMA Group) (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 468, 484.)
Defendant Siobhan ODonnells Motion to Strike Portions of the First Amended Complaint is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND per Code of Civil Procedure sections 435 et seq. There are insufficient facts stated to support a claim for punitive damages. Accordingly, the motion to strike will be granted without leave to amend, especially in light of the ruling on the demurrer.
Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 20 days of this Courts order.
Notice of this Courts ruling to be given by counsel for Defendant.
1
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”