Sandra J Tapia et al v Arroyo Seco Construction et al
Motion to File FAC
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Case Number
Case Type Civil Law & Motion Hearing Date / Time Mon, 07/13/2026 - 10:00 Nature of Proceedings Motion to File FAC Tentative Ruling On March 18, 2026, plaintiffs filed this motion for leave to file a first amended complaint. No proof of service is attached to motion or separately filed; no opposition or other response has been filed to the motion. The hearing on the motion is continued to September 28, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. to permit service of the moving papers and any opposition. The case management conference now set for September 28, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. will be continued to 10:00 a.m. to take place concurrently with the motion. Counsel for plaintiffs shall serve notice of this order of continuance, together the moving papers for the motion, and file proof of such service on or before July 20, 2026.
In reviewing the court's files to find an applicable proof of service, the court also noted that defendants Arroyo Seco Construction, Wyllis Heaton, and Wes Grieger served on July 2 and filed on July 6 a document on entitled, "Proof of Service." The document does not identify what document was served for which proof is being made; the proof of service attached to the "Proof of Service" merely states that what was served was the "Proof of Service.
Tentative Ruling: Matter of Pozzebon Gift Trust and Pozzebon Family Trust Tentative Ruling: Matter of Pozzebon Gift Trust and Pozzebon Family Trust
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”