DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
VCU313509·tulare-civil·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

Asman, Bruce E. et al vs. Ponce, Cipriano et al

Motion to File Amended Complaint

Hearing date
May 28, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 25, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBruce E. Asman
DefendantCipriano Ponce

Ruling

Case No.: VCU313509 Date: May 28, 2026 Time: 8:30 A.M. Dept. 1-The Honorable David C. Mathias Motion: Motion to File Amended Complaint Tentative Ruling: The Court's file does not contain the actual motion or supporting documents, only the proposed first amended complaint. However, the opposition filed, and reply, reference a motion. As such, the Court orders Plaintiffs to file the motion, and supporting documents no later than ten (10) days from the date of this hearing. The Court, therefore, continues this matter to June 25, 2026; 8:30 am; D1.

If no one requests oral argument, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5(a) and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will become the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order. Court reporters are usually not available for law and motion matters in the civil division. The parties and counsel must provide their own reporter

if they want a transcript of the proceedings. Re: Clubb, Mykayla vs. Orchard Square 79, LLC

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share