Valadez, Brenda et al vs. DLR Management Group, Inc.
Plaintiff's Motions to Enforce Court Orders re: Defendant Kamohai as to (1) Further Responses to Form Interrogatories (Set One); (2) Further Responses to Form Interrogatories (Set Two); (3) Further Responses to Request For Production of Documents (Set One) (4) Further Responses to Requests for Admissions (Set One)
Motion type
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Parties
Ruling
Case No.: VCU310362 Date: July 13, 2026 Time: 8:30 A.M. Dept. 9-The Honorable Nathan D. Ide Motion: Plaintiff's Motions to Enforce Court Orders re: Defendant Kamohai as to (1) Further Responses to Form Interrogatories (Set One); (2) Further Responses to Form Interrogatories (Set Two); (3) Further Responses to Request For Production of Documents (Set One) (4) Further Responses to Requests for Admissions (Set One) Tentative Ruling: (1) through (4) To continue these motions to July 27, 2026, 8:30 am, Dept.
9. These motions were filed June 22, 2026, less than sixteen court days prior to the July 13, 2026 hearing date (See Code of Civil Procedure section 1005.) Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of the continued hearing. If no one requests oral argument, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5(a) and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will become the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order. Court reporters are usually not available for law and motion matters in the civil division. The parties and counsel must provide their own reporter if they want a transcript of the proceedings. Re: V., J. vs. County of Tulare
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”