DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CECG04303·fresno·Probate·Property Dispute
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

Hicks v. Jackson

By Defendant for Owelty Lien and Accounting

Hearing date
Jul 1, 2026
Department
503
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffHicks
DefendantJackson

Ruling

(37) Tentative Ruling

Re: Hicks v. Jackson Superior Court Case No. 23CECG04303

Hearing Date: July 1, 2026 (Dept. 503)

Motion: By Defendant for Owelty Lien and Accounting

Tentative Ruling:

To deny, without prejudice. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1005.)

Explanation:

On June 18, 2026, defendant filed and served a Notice and Motion for Owelty Lien and Accounting. Unless otherwise ordered, “all moving and supporting papers shall be served and filed at least 16 court days before the hearing.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1005, subd. (b).) Here, the motion is untimely as it was filed and served just eight court days before the hearing date. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 12.) As such, the motion is denied, without prejudice.

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Tentative Ruling

Issued By: JS on 6/29/2026. (Judge’s initials) (Date)

9

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share