DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CECG01122·fresno·Probate·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

Corral v. Webull Financial

by Defendant for Judgment on the Pleadings

Hearing date
Jul 1, 2026
Department
502
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 11, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCorral
DefendantWebull Financial

Ruling

(34) Tentative Ruling

Re: Corral v. Webull Financial Superior Court Case No. 24CECG01122

Hearing Date: July 1, 2026 (Dept. 502)

Motion: by Defendant for Judgment on the Pleadings

If oral argument is timely requested, it will be entertained on Wednesday, July 15 2026, at 3:30 p.m. in Department 502.

Tentative Ruling:

To continue the hearing to August 11, 2026 at 3:30 p.m. in Department 502. Defendant to file a proof of service of the moving papers to plaintiff’s new address by July 10, 2026. The deadlines to file opposition and reply shall be based on the new hearing date of August 11, 2026.

Explanation:

The court received a letter indicating plaintiff’s address is now California Men’s Colony State Prison, PO Box 8101, CDC 6288, San Luis Obispo, CA 93409-8010. It is unclear from the letter when the plaintiff’s address changed or whether defendant was provided notice of the change of address. In order to ensure plaintiff has the opportunity to review and oppose defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, the hearing on the motion is continued to August 11, 2026 for defendant to serve plaintiff at his current address. The deadlines for opposition and reply shall be based on the new hearing date.

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Tentative Ruling

Issued By: lmg on 6-29-26. (Judge’s initials) (Date)

7

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share