DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV-0208527·shasta·Civil·General Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoSanctions imposed

WIEMERS, ET AL. VS. HOERNING, ET AL.

Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 13, 2026
Department
63
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 14, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$250

Parties

PlaintiffChristopher Wiemers
PlaintiffMichael Rooney
DefendantHoerning

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25CV-0208527 Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions: An Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions issued on May 20, 2026 to Plaintiffs Christopher Wiemers and Michael Rooney and counsel Rooney Law Firm for failure to timely serve Defendant as required by California Rules of Court, Rule 3.110(b). “The complaint must be served on all named defendants and proofs of service on those defendants must be filed with the court within 60 days after the filing of the complaint.” CRC 3.110(b). The Complaint in this matter was filed on August 25, 2025 and no Proof of Service of Summons has been filed. Plaintiffs did not file a written response.

Without sufficient excuse for the delay, sanctions are imposed in the amount of $250 against Plaintiffs and counsel. The clerk is directed to prepare a separate Order of Sanctions. The Court will issue an Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal for failure to timely serve per CRC 3.110(b) and failure to timely prosecute. Hearing on the Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal will be on Monday September 14, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 63. The clerk is directed to prepare the Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal.

****************************************************************************************** 9:00 a.m. – Review Hearings ****************************************************************************************** CAPITAL ONE, N.A. VS. FORTNER

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share