DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CV0006252·marin·Civil·Other
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Cooper Klinger v. New Ride Electric LLC

MOTION – AMEND FIRST COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jul 14, 2026
Department
A
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCooper Klinger
DefendantNew Ride Electric LLC

Ruling

In light of the late filing of Plaintiff’s proposed amended pleading, Defendant may appear to request an opportunity to file a revised opposition. Otherwise, the Court’s tentative is as follows:

The motion of Plaintiff Cooper Klinger (“Plaintiff”) for leave to file an amended complaint is GRANTED.

Discussion

Under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (a)(1), the Court may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading or proceeding. As judicial policy favors resolution of all disputed matters in the same lawsuit, courts liberally permit amendments of the pleadings. (Nestle v. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920, 939.) Denial is rarely justified unless opposing parties demonstrate unreasonable delay plus prejudice if the motion is granted. (Higgins v. Del Faro (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 558, 564-565.)

Here, there is no claim of delay or prejudice. Instead Defendant asserts that many of the new claims are not well-pleaded. Generally, arguments attacking the merits of the proposed amendments do not justify denial of the motion. Courts allow the amendment and then let the parties test the legal sufficiency in other appropriate proceedings such as a demurrer. (See Kittredge Sports Co. v. Superior Court (1989) 213 Cal.App.3d 1045, 1048.)

The motion is therefore granted without prejudice to Defendant bringing an appropriate motion challenging the new pleading or claims.

All parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 2.10(B) to contest the tentative decision. Parties who request oral argument are required to appear in person or remotely by ZOOM. Regardless of whether a party requests oral argument in accordance with Rule 2.10(B), the prevailing party shall prepare an order consistent with the announced ruling as required by Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 2.11.

The Zoom appearance information for July, 2026 is as follows: https://marin-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1605267272?pwd=908CbP6TV2mhCAyai1nzo6lyz2dKaw.1 Meeting ID: 160 526 7272 Passcode: 026935

If you are unable to join by video, you may join by telephone by calling (669) 254-5252 and using the above-provided passcode. Zoom appearance information may also be found on the Court’s website: https://www.marin.courts.ca.gov

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share