DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25680825·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED in part and DENIED in part

BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY VS. FREDDIE GILBERT

Notice Of Motion To Compel Defendant Freddie Gilberts Responses To Plaintiffs Form Interrogatories General, Set One, Plaintiffs Form Interrogatories Unlawful Detainer, Set One, Plaintiff?S Request For Production Of Documents, Set One, To Deem Facts Admitted And Request For Sanctions Against Defendant Freddie Gilbert In The Amount Of $585.00

Hearing date
Jul 13, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$585.00$585

Parties

PlaintiffBRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY
DefendantFREDDIE GILBERT

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680825 - July 13, 2026 Hearing date: July 13, 2026 Case number: CUD25680825 Case title: BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY VS. FREDDIE GILBERT Case Number: | | CUD25680825 | Case Title: | | BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY VS. FREDDIE GILBERT | Court Date: | | 2026-07-13 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion To Compel Defendant Freddie Gilberts Responses To Plaintiffs Form Interrogatories General, Set One, Plaintiffs Form Interrogatories Unlawful Detainer, Set One, Plaintiff?S Request For Production Of Documents, Set One, To Deem Facts Admitted And Request For Sanctions Against Defendant Freddie Gilbert In The Amount Of $585.00 | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 13, 2026. Line 8.

Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant's Responses to Plaintiff's Interrogatories, Request for Production of Documents, to Deem Facts Admitted and Request for Sanctions Against Defendant in the Amount of $585 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

Defendant shall serve complete verified responses without objection to Plaintiff's Form Interrogatories-Unlawful Detainer (Set One); Form Interrogatories-General (Set One); and Request for Production of Documents (Set One) within 5 days of notice of entry of order.

Motion to deem admissions is denied, because Defendant has served a substantially compliant response to Plaintiff's Requests for Admission before the hearing.

Sanctions granted in the amount of $585. Provided, however, that the sanctions will be waived if Defendant timely complies with this order by serving complete verified responses to the outstanding discovery, as directed above.=(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share