DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV-03448·merced·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Emily Welch, et al. vs Go Go Bake Corporation, et al.

Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documents; Request for Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 10, 2026
Department
8
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,000$2,544

Parties

PlaintiffEmily Welch
DefendantGo Go Bake Corporation
DefendantFelipe Jeronimo Matias

Ruling

25CV-03448 Emily Welch, et al. vs Go Go Bake Corporation, et al.

Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documents, Set One, Number 8, to Defendant Go Go Bake Corporation and Request for Monetary Sanctions Against Go Go Bake Corporation and Felipe Jeronimo Matias

Plaintiff’s motion to compel further responses to Requests for Production of Documents, Set One, Number 8 is GRANTED. Defendant is to provide a further code-compliant verified response to Requests for Production of Documents, Set One, Number 8 within ten (10) days of this court’s order.

The request for monetary sanctions is GRANTED. Monetary sanctions in the amount of $1,000 are to be paid to Plaintiff within fifteen (15) days of this court’s order.

In addition, Defendant is ordered to pay Plaintiff $2,544 for court reporter and videographer fees incurred as a result of Defendant Matias’ failure to appear at his duly noticed deposition on April 8, 2026. These costs are to be paid to Plaintiff within fifteen (15) days of this court’s order.

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share