DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV456053·santaclara·Civil·Enforcement of Judgment
Hearing about 2 months agoOrdered to appear

Sudhandshu Juneja vs Lavan Construction

Return of Warrant & Order for Examination

Hearing date
Jul 10, 2026
Department
12
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$5,000.00

Parties

PlaintiffSudhandshu Juneja
DefendantLavan Construction

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 12 (Hon. Nahal Iravani-Sani) Hon. Jose S. Franco, Presiding Courtroom Clerk, Ryan Nguyen 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2230

DATE: 7/10/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.

LINE 6 25CV456053 Sudhandshu Juneja vs Hearing on Return of Warrant & Order for Examination Lavan Construction Judgment Debtor Lavan Construction/CEO Moein Cyrus Poudat (“Defendant”) was ordered to appear in person in Department 20 on January 14, 2026 at 9:01 AM for an Examination where Defendant was to give information regarding a money judgment against Defendant. Because Defendant violated the Court Order by failing to appear at the January 14, 2026 hearing for Examination, the Court issued a Civil Bench Warrant for Defendant’s arrest in the amount of $5,000.00.

That $5,000.00 Civil Bench Warrant was served on Moein Poudat on February 17, 2026, at which time he signed a written promise to appear in person for an Examination on April 17, 2026 at 9:01 AM in Department 12. On April 17, 2026, the Civil Bench Warrant was set aside by the Court, the parties met and conferred “regarding the OEX” in the jury room, and the matter was continued to July 10, 2026 at 9:00. Accordingly, the parties are ordered to appear in person for this Examination.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share