DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV179770·alameda·Civil·Civil Litigation
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

CHESS, et al. vs TESLA, INC.

Defendant Tesla, Inc.’s Motion to Stay Pending Related Writ Petition

Hearing date
Jul 10, 2026
Department
15
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Aug 14, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAdreauna Chess
DefendantTesla, Inc.

Ruling

26CV179770: CHESS, et al. vs TESLA, INC. 07/10/2026 Hearing on Motion - Other - Defendant Tesla, Inc.’s Motion to Stay Pending Related Writ Petition; filed by Tesla, Inc. (Defendant) CRS# A-179770-001 in Department 15

Tentative Ruling - 07/06/2026 Peter Borkon

The Motion for Stay of Proceedings filed by Tesla, Inc. on 06/12/2026 is Granted.

The motion of Tesla to Stay Case Pending Related Writ Petition (CRS# A-179770-001) is GRANTED. On 6/26/26, Plaintiffs Adreauna Chess, et al. (“Plaintiffs”) filed a notice of Non- Opposition. See separate order. The Court previously ruled that the following cases are related: Smith v. Tesla, 25CV133754 Brown v. Tesla, 25CV134492 Hodges v. Tesla, 25CV134548 Bibbens v. Tesla, 25CV134602 Barnette v. Tesla, 25CV134790 Jack v. Tesla, 25CV146348 Patrick v. Tesla, 25CV146481 Chess v. Tesla, 26CV179770 Mayberry v. Tesla, 26CV192816

Within 7 days after remittitur or any order lifting the stay, Counsel will inform the Court. The Court related this case to the Smith et al cases and will set a CMC on August 24, 2026 at 9:30 am to assess status of remittitur.

The Court hereby stays the case in its entirety.

FURTHER CONFERENCE A Case Management Conference is scheduled for 08/14/2026 at 09:30 AM in Department 15.

Updated Case Management Statements must be filed no later than 15 days prior to the CMC. If the foregoing date is a court holiday or a weekend, the time is extended to the next business day. All CMC statements shall be submitted on pleading paper with a brief summary of the status of the case and any specified issues that need to be addressed by the Court. Do not use Judicial Council Form CM-110.

The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share