DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV066869·alameda·Civil·Case Management
Hearing about 2 months agoCMC set to confirm mediation completion is vacated; Mandatory Settlement Conference and Jury Trial date maintained.

MA vs SUSHI GO GO, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, et al.

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Jul 10, 2026
Department
520
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMA
DefendantSUSHI GO GO, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

Ruling

24CV066869: MA vs SUSHI GO GO, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, et al. 07/10/2026 Case Management Conference in Department 520

Tentative Ruling - 07/07/2026 Jamilah A. Jefferson

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT

The Court has ordered the following after review of the case.

The Court makes the following order after review of the case without a hearing:

CMC Statement(s) indicate mediation has been completed. CMC set to confirm mediation completion is vacated.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE set for July 16, 2026 at 9:00 am in Dept. 302 IS MAINTAINED.

The parties are reminded that WRITTEN SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENTS setting forth a GOOD FAITH ANALYSIS of the facts, the law and a GOOD FAITH OFFER to resolve this case from each party must be emailed directly to dept301@alameda.courts.ca.gov. All trial counsel, parties, and insurance adjusters or others with full settlement authority must participate in person.

THE JURY TRIAL DATE OF August 21, 2026 IS MAINTAINED.

The Court is currently conducting live, in-person jury trials. Please carefully review the TRIAL SETTING ORDER issued in this case and fully comply with its pretrial orders and deadlines. Courtesy copies of all MIL/OPPS and REPLIES must e delivered to Dept. 520 by August 18, 2026.

Clerk is directed to serve copies of this order, with proof of service, to counsel and to selfrepresented parties of record. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share