Motion to Compel Response to Form Interrogatories (Set One); Motion to Compel Response to Request for Production (Set One); Motion to Deem Matters Admitted
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR JULY 10, 2026
2. LAND HOME FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. v. BURKE, 25CV3470
(A) Motion to Compel Response to Form Interrogatories (Set One)
(B) Motion to Compel Response to Request for Production (Set One)
(C) Motion to Deem Matters Admitted
Motion to Compel Response to Form Interrogatories (Set One) On April 28, 2026, cross-complainant Gregory Burke (“cross-complainant”),1 who is
proceeding in pro per, filed the instant motion to compel cross-defendant Land Home
Financial Services, Inc.’s (“cross-defendant”) verified response to Form Interrogatories (Set One) and requested the court to impose a monetary sanction for reasonable fees
and costs incurred bringing the motion.
Cross-defendant filed no opposition.
The court grants the motion to compel and imposes a monetary sanction against
cross-defendant in the amount of $60.00, representing the filing fee for the motion. The
court denies the request for attorney fees because, as a self-represented litigant, cross-
complainant is not entitled to recover attorney fees as discovery sanctions. (Argaman v.
Ratan (1999) 73 Cal.App.4th 1173, 1179 (“Argaman”).)
Motion to Compel Response to Request for Production (Set One)
On April 28, 2026, cross-complainant Gregory Burke (“cross-complainant”),2 who is
proceeding in pro per, filed the instant motion to compel cross-defendant Land Home
Financial Services, Inc.’s (“cross-defendant”) verified response to Request for Production
(Set One) and requested the court to impose a monetary sanction for reasonable fees
and costs incurred bringing the motion.
1 The body of the motion indicates that it is brought by Gregory Burke; the motion is
also signed by Gregory Burke. It appears that cross-complainant inadvertently listed co- cross-complainant Griffin Burke’s information in the caption of the pleading. 2 The body of the motion indicates that it is brought by Gregory Burke; the motion is
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR JULY 10, 2026
Cross-defendant filed no opposition.
The court grants the motion to compel and imposes a monetary sanction against
cross-defendant in the amount of $60.00, representing the filing fee for the motion. The
court denies the request for attorney fees because, as a self-represented litigant, cross-
complainant is not entitled to recover attorney fees as discovery sanctions. (Argaman,
supra, 73 Cal.App.4th at p. 1179.)
Motion to Deem Matters Admitted
A party served with requests for admission must serve a response within 30 days.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.250.) Failure to serve a response entitles the requesting party,
on motion, to obtain an order that the genuineness of all documents and the truth of all
matters specified in the requests for admission be deemed admitted. (Code Civ. Proc.,
§ 2033.280, subd. (b).) When such a motion is made, the court must grant the motion
and deem the requests admitted unless it finds that prior to the hearing, the party to
whom the requests for admission were directed has served a proposed response that is
in substantial compliance with the provisions governing responses. (Code Civ. Proc.,
§ 2033.280, subd. (c); St. Mary v. Superior Court (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 762, 776, 778;
396 [“two strikes and you’re out”].)
In opposition to the instant motion, cross-defendant Land Home Financial Services,
Inc. submitted a declaration showing that it served its response to the requests for
admission on July 6, 2026.
Therefore, the court denies the motion to deem matters admitted.
TENTATIVE RULING # 2:
MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORIES (SET ONE): THE MOTION TO COMPEL IS GRANTED IN PART. CROSS-DEFENDANT LAND HOME FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. SHALL SERVE ITS VERIFIED RESPONSE WITHOUT
LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR JULY 10, 2026
OBJECTIONS TO CROSS-COMPLAINANT GREGORY BURKE’S FORM INTERROGATORIES
(SET ONE), AND PAY CROSS-COMPLAINANT A MONETARY SANCTION OF $60.00,
WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THE NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER.
MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION (SET ONE): THE MOTION TO COMPEL IS GRANTED IN PART. CROSS-DEFENDANT LAND HOME
FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. SHALL SERVE ITS VERIFIED RESPONSE WITHOUT
OBJECTIONS TO CROSS-COMPLAINANT GREGORY BURKE’S REQUEST FOR
PRODUCTION (SET ONE), AND PAY CROSS-COMPLAINANT A MONETARY SANCTION OF $60.00, WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THE NOTICE OF ENTRY OF
ORDER.
MOTION TO DEEM MATTERS ADMITTED: THE MOTION IS DENIED.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD (LEWIS v. SUPERIOR COURT (1999) 19
CAL.4TH 1232, 1247), UNLESS A NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR AND REQUEST FOR
ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S
WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 573-3042 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE
DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF AN INTENT TO
APPEAR MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SAID
NOTICE MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING.