DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
26CV-0209772·shasta·Civil·Civil
Appearance necessary

REGO VS. HO

Review hearing

Hearing date
May 18, 2026
Department
63
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffRego
DefendantHo

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 26CV-0209772 This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of judgment/dismissal. Plaintiff filed a Notice of Unconditional Settlement on February 13, 2026 indicating that the matter would be dismissed within 45 days. The matter has not been dismissed and no status statement was filed. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar. Absent an appearance and good cause being presented, the Court intends to dismiss the matter without prejudice per CRC 3.1385(b).

SHARIT VS. DELIGHT FOODS, INC.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share