Case	County / Judge	Motion	Ruling	Date

Live data

5,734 rulings indexed. Last ingest 1 minute ago.

Scraper runs every ~15 min during California business hours.

Explore

Monitored counties + coverage Judge directory Attorney directory Help · About the dataset Public API About DecisionDepot

Open source

Pipeline + web app are open on GitHub.

DecisionDepot is for informational use only. Not legal advice. Always verify against the source PDF before relying on any ruling.

Case	County / Judge	Motion	Ruling	Date

26CV-0209772 · SHASTA · Civil · Dept 63

REGO VS. HO

Case Information

Hearing date: May 18, 2026

Department: 63

Judge: Unknown

Prevailing party: N/A

Ruling: Appearance necessary

Appearance: Required

Case type: Civil

Motion(s)

Review hearing

Motion Type Tags

Other

Parties

Plaintiff: Rego
Defendant: Ho

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 26CV-0209772 This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of judgment/dismissal. Plaintiff filed a Notice of Unconditional Settlement on February 13, 2026 indicating that the matter would be dismissed within 45 days. The matter has not been dismissed and no status statement was filed. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar. Absent an appearance and good cause being presented, the Court intends to dismiss the matter without prejudice per CRC 3.1385(b).

SHARIT VS. DELIGHT FOODS, INC.

Source: California Superior Court tentative ruling. Retrieved from DecisionDepot on 5/18/2026. Not legal advice.