DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
TP00-0123·nevada·Probate·Conservatorship
Hearing 4 months agoConservatorship to continue as it remains necessary and appropriate.

In the Matter of DAVID H PLUFF et al

Biennial Review

Hearing date
Apr 13, 2026
Department
Dept. A
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Apr 10, 2028
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherDAVID H PLUFF

Ruling

April 13, 2026 Truckee Probate Tentative Rulings

1. TP00-0123 In the Matter of DAVID H PLUFF et al

No appearances are required. Conservatorship to continue as it remains necessary and appropriate. The conservator is acting in the best interests of Conservatee regarding Conservatee's placement and quality of care including physical and mental treatment. The Court was pleased to see the conservator’s level of involvement in his brother’s care has increased. The next biennial review is set for April 10, 2028, at 1:30 pm in Dept. A. The court investigation fee is waived.

2. TP17-6592 In the Matter of WALKER MICHAEL LINDSAY

No appearances required. The Court finds the Limited Conservatorship remains necessary and appropriate and, thus, shall remain in effect. The Court finds the co-conservator’s are very clearly acting in Conservatee’s best interests regarding his placement and quality of care including physical and metal treatment. The investigation report fee is waived. The next review hearing is set for April 10, 2028 at 1:30 p.m. in Dept. A. The Court reminds the conservators any change to the conservatorship must be properly noticed. The Court’s self-help office can assist if desired.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share