DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25625401·sf·Civil·Personal Injury / Medical Malpractice
Hearing about 2 months ago

PAUL SOLON VS. IRA SHARLIP ET AL

Second Re-Notice Of Motions And Motions To Sue A Md For Punitive Damages; For Relief Form Court'S Order To File Amended Compalint By April 24, 2026 Due To New, Unforeseen Medical Problems; And, To Seal From Public Viewing The Intimate, Perosnal, Medical Portions Of The Complaint And The Pleadings

Hearing date
Jul 9, 2026
Department
301
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPAUL SOLON
DefendantIRA SHARLIP

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC25625401 - July 9, 2026 Hearing date: July 9, 2026 Case number: CGC25625401 Case title: PAUL SOLON VS. IRA SHARLIP ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25625401 | Case Title: | | PAUL SOLON VS. IRA SHARLIP ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-09 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Second Re-Notice Of Motions And Motions To Sue A Md For Punitive Damages; For Relief Form Court'S Order To File Amended Compalint By April 24, 2026 Due To New, Unforeseen Medical Problems; And, To Seal From Public Viewing The Intimate, Perosnal, Medical Portions Of The Complaint And The Pleadings | Rulings: | | Matter on calendar for Thursday, July 09, 2026, Line, PLAINTIFF PAUL SOLON's Second Re-Notice Of Motions To Sue A Md For Punitive Damages; For Relief Form Court's Order To File Amended Compalint By April 24, 2026 Due To New, Unforeseen Medical Problems; And, To Seal From Public Viewing The Intimate, Perosnal, Medical Portions Of The Complaint And The Pleadings. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share