Doe vs. Jean Reno, LLC

Herscovitz-Langstaff also declares that no proceeding is now pending in the State of California for administration of the Estate of William N. Langstaff. (See id., ¶ 3.)

She also states that no other person has a superior right to commence this action or to be substituted for Plaintiff William N. Langtstaff, DDS in in this action. (See id., ¶ 5).

Finally, Herscovitz-Langstaff declares under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above statements are true and correct. ((See id. at p. 2.)

Here, Langstaff-Herscovitz has complied with the requirements of Section 377.32.

Further, no opposition or response to the motion has been filed. Thus, any arguments regarding the motion have been waived. (See Nazir v. United Airlines, Inc. (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 243, 288 [failure to address or oppose issue in motion constitutes waiver of that issue]; see DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Co. v. Superior Court (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 562, 566 [holding that failure to challenge contention in brief results in the concession on that issue].)

Therefore, the court will grant the motion

Successor in Interest Toby Herscovitz-Langstaff shall give notice of this ruling.

4 Doe vs. Jean Reno, LLC Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel

Counsel Matt D. Zumstein’s and Shaida 30-2025-01505591 Shahinfar’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel For Defendant Jean Reno, LLC dba Glyph Salon is taken OFF CALENDAR pursuant to Defendant Jean Reno LLC dba Glyph Salon’s Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel filed on June 2, 2026 (ROA #72).

5 Knoll vs. Colbert Motions to Be Relieved as Counsel