DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV-06687·merced·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

Rebecca Muro vs Wendy’s of the Pacific, Inc.

Motion to Compel Further Responses and for Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Jun 26, 2026
Department
Courtroom 8
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 17, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRebecca Muro
DefendantWendy’s of the Pacific, Inc.

Ruling

25CV-06687 Rebecca Muro vs Wendy’s of the Pacific, Inc.

Motion to Compel Further Responses and for Monetary Sanctions

Continued to July 17, 2026, at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 8.

“A meet and confer declaration in support of a motion shall state facts showing a reasonable and good faith attempt, either in person, by telephone, or by video conference, to informally resolve each issue presented by the motion.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2016.040, subd. (a), [italics added].)

Although a meet and confer declaration was filed by Plaintiff, it only states that a meet and confer letter was sent by email on April 28, 2026, which was responded to by Defendant by email on May 8, 2026, and a subsequent meet and confer letter sent by email on May 14, 2026 (Meehan Decl. ¶¶ 4-6, Exhibits D, E, F). Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2016.040 subdivision (a), there must be a reasonable and good faith attempt to meet and confer in person, by telephone, or by video conference. The singular phone call attempt as stated in Plaintiff’s reply is insufficient.

The parties are ordered to engage in meet and confer efforts over their dispute in person, by phone, or by video conference, as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 2016.040, subdivision (a).

If the parties are able to resolve their dispute, then Plaintiff shall promptly take the motion to compel further responses off calendar. If the parties are not able to resolve their dispute, then Plaintiff’s counsel shall file a declaration regarding the meet and confer efforts by July 10, 2026.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share