DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV088627·alameda·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

MUNGUIA, AN INDIVIDUAL, et al. vs QUINTANA, AN INDIVIDUAL, et al.

Motion for Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 6, 2026
Department
520
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 6, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$500

Parties

PlaintiffJUAN MANUEL VALDES MARTINEZ
PlaintiffNERY JENNIFER NUNEZ IZAGUIRRE
DefendantJOSE MANUEL VERGARA QUINTANA
DefendantKRISTYNLORETH MOLINA
DefendantALICIA RUBALCAVA

Ruling

24CV088627: MUNGUIA, AN INDIVIDUAL, et al. vs QUINTANA, AN INDIVIDUAL, et al. 07/06/2026 Case Management Conference Completion of Mediation in Department 520

Tentative Ruling - 06/30/2026 Jamilah A. Jefferson

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT

The Court has ordered the following after review of the case.

PARTIES SANCTIONED FOR FAILING TO COMPLETE MEDIATION

In the TRIAL SETTING ORDER dated JULY 14, 2025, the parties were ordered to complete mediation by JUNE 01, 2026. A CMC was set for JULY 06, 2026, for the express purpose of confirming that mediation had been completed.

CMC Statements were filed no explanation was offered for the failure to abide by the Court’s Order.

Accordingly, as the TRIAL SETTING ORDER said could occur, each party is now sanctioned $500 for failure to complete mediation as ordered. Sanctions are due in full the first day of trial.

However, if Mediation is completed or a Notice of Settlement is filed before the Mandatory Settlement Conference now set for AUGUST 06, 2026 at 9 am in Dept 302, the sanctions will be vacated.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE set for AUGUST 06, 2026, at 9am in Dept. 302 IS MAINTAINED.

The parties are reminded that WRITTEN SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENTS setting forth a GOOD FAITH ANALYSIS of the facts, the law and a GOOD FAITH OFFER to resolve this case from each party must be emailed directly to dept302@alameda.courts.ca.gov. All trial counsel, parties, and insurance adjusters or others with full settlement authority must participate in person.

The JURY TRIAL date of SEPTEMBER 18, 2026, is MAINTAINED.

The Court is currently conducting fully in person, live jury trials. Please carefully review the TRIAL SETTING ORDER issued in this case and fully comply with its pretrial orders and deadlines. Courtesy copies of all MIL/OPPS and Replies must be delivered to Dept. 520 24CV088627: MUNGUIA, AN INDIVIDUAL, et al. vs QUINTANA, AN INDIVIDUAL, et al. 07/06/2026 Case Management Conference Completion of Mediation in Department 520

JUAN MANUEL VALDES MARTINEZ, an individual (Plaintiff) is ordered to pay sanctions in the amount of $500.00 to the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda by 09/18/2026 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 177.5 for Failure to complete mediation as ordered..

NERY JENNIFER NUNEZ IZAGUIRRE, an individual (Plaintiff) is ordered to pay sanctions in the amount of $500.00 to the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda by 09/18/2026 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 177.5 for Failure to complete mediation as ordered..

JOSE MANUEL VERGARA QUINTANA, an individual (Defendant) is ordered to pay sanctions in the amount of $500.00 to the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda by 09/18/2026 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 177.5 for Failure to complete mediation as ordered..

KRISTYNLORETH MOLINA, an individual (Defendant) is ordered to pay sanctions in the amount of $500.00 to the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda by 09/18/2026 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 177.5 for Failure to complete mediation as ordered..

ALICIA RUBALCAVA, an individual (Defendant) is ordered to pay sanctions in the amount of $500.00 to the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda by 09/18/2026 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 177.5 for Failure to complete mediation as ordered..

Clerk is directed to serve copies of this order, with proof of service, to counsel and to selfrepresented parties of record. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share