DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681640·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

UNIVERSITY PRESIDENT ASSOCIATES, LP VS. WILLIAM CORY MANLEY ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Filed By Plaintiff University President Associates, Lp, Against Defendant William Corey Manley

Hearing date
Jul 2, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffUNIVERSITY PRESIDENT ASSOCIATES, LP
DefendantWILLIAM CORY MANLEY

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681640 - July 2, 2026 Hearing date: July 2, 2026 Case number: CUD26681640 Case title: UNIVERSITY PRESIDENT ASSOCIATES, LP VS. WILLIAM CORY MANLEY ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681640 | Case Title: | | UNIVERSITY PRESIDENT ASSOCIATES, LP VS. WILLIAM CORY MANLEY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-02 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Filed By Plaintiff University President Associates, Lp, Against Defendant William Corey Manley | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 2, 2026. Line 9.

PLAINTIFF UNIVERSITY PRESIDENT ASSOCIATES, LP MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Against Defendant William Corey Manley is DENIED. Triable issues of material fact exist, including but not limited to the whether the Three-Day Notice to Pay Rent or Quit overstated the amount of rent due. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share