Daniel Skelton et.al. vs FCA US, LLC

2 To access the courtroom, click or copy and paste this link into your internet browser and scroll to Department 6: https://santaclara.courts.ca.gov/online-services/remote-hearings LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING

9:00 1 20CV361306 Edge Law Group vs. Bomi Joseph Defendant moves this court to dismiss this case for Plaintiff’s fail ure to bring this case to trial within five year period. Plaintiff and Defendant both stipulated to continuances beyond the five year period. The Court also imposed dates beyond the 5 year period. Defendant’s motion is DENIED.

9:00 2-3 20CV366946 Rajesh Raghani vs. Samir Maharjan, et. al. See below.

9:00 4 21CV390666 Eric Hartman et.al. vs Koshy P. George Defendant moves this court to award attorney fees and costs. Defendant was the prevailing party. Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. Court seeks oral argument regarding amount of sanctions.

9:00 5 22CV409006 Ray Chen vs. Bing Lu, et. al. Receiver moves this court to approve the business sale of business known as Bing’s Dumplings; approve business management agreement; and approve lease agreement for business premises. The court finds that it has jurisdiction over Bing’s Dumplings as it is a business owned and operated by defendants. Receiver’s motion is GRANTED.

9:00 6 923CV42234 Zenaida Seid v. Lucian Naum Zenaida Seid v. Lucian Naum Defendant moves this court for continuance of all legal matters due to Defendant’s medical condition. Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. Court requests inpu t from both parties as to further dates.

9:00 7 24CV432080 Serenity MSO, LLC et.al. vs Palo Alto Mind Body, et. al. Defendant moves this court to disqualify attorneys representing plain tiff. Defendant and plaintiff worked together in growing a psychiatric practice. Documents were shared. Both parties appear to hold privilege of con fidential information at the time because they were willingly sharing such i nformation. Defendant’s motion is DENIED.

9:00 8 24CV450596 Daniel Skelton et.al. vs FCA US, LLC Plaintiff petitions this court to compel defendant to respond to a reque st for production of documents. Although late, it appears Defendant has comp lied with Plaintiff’s request. Motion is DENIED.

9:00 9 25CV467677 Saneed Shaik vs. Satish Yezzu Plaintiff moves this court to that Defendant be served summons and complaint through the Secretary of State’s Office. Plaintiff has attempted to serve Defendant diligently. Defendant’s motion is GRANTED.

9:00 10 25CV467677 Zou Hanshu v. Hao Chen, et.al. Defendant moves this court to grant a demurrer as to Plaintiff’s complaint. Plaintiff does not oppose the demurrer. Defendant’s motion for demurrer is GRANTED.