DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CUD25680075·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
DENIED

Zelko Simoni et al v. Douglas Lomas et al

Motion for Summary Judgment

Hearing date
Jan 7, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Motion for Summary Judgment

Parties

PlaintiffZelko Simoni
PlaintiffRenee Simoni
DefendantDouglas Lomas
DefendantStephanie Lomas

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680075 - January 7, 2026 Hearing date: January 7, 2026 Case number: CUD25680075 Case title: ZELKO SIMONI ET AL VS. DOUGLAS LOMAS ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680075 | Case Title: | | ZELKO SIMONI ET AL VS. DOUGLAS LOMAS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-07 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / Notice Of Motion For Summary Judgment | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 7, 2026. Line 21.

PLAINTIFF ZELKO SIMONI, RENEE SIMONI MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / Notice Of Motion For Summary Judgment is DENIED.

Plaintiffs have not met their initial burden of showing they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law because they have not shown that the tenancy of Stephanie Lomas was terminated. Plaintiffs provide no authority for their assertion that the tenancy terminated by operation of law when Plaintiffs learned that Stephanie Lomas was not physically residing in the premises.

This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. Prevailing party to prepare an order in compliance with CCP 437c(g). (MT)

Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom (Video - Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666; Passcode: 872834). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share