Motion to Stay Dissolution of Defendant Lockbox Escapes LLC and Appointment of a Receiver, and Order Buyout Pursuant to Corp. Code § 17707.03(c)
26CV164744: PALTSEVA vs SCHAFER, et al. 06/17/2026 Hearing on Motion - Other TO STAY DISSOLUTION OF DEFENDNANT LOCKBOX ESCAPES LLC AND APPOINTMENT OF A RECIVVER, AND ORDER BUYOUT PURSUANT TO CORP. CODE § 17707.03(C); filed by Monica Schafer (Defendant) CRS# 142652803645 in Department 520
Tentative Ruling - 06/16/2026 Jamilah A. Jefferson
The Motion of Defendant Monica Schafer (Defendant) to Stay was GRANTED IN PART. The Court considered the parties' written submissions and arguments at the prior hearing.
Although the parties have filed various ex-parte applications for temporary restraining orders since the initial hearing on this Motion for Stay, there is no specific indication that the appraisers have completed the appraisals and submitted reports for consideration.
Given that the appraisers were appointed approximately thirty-five (35) days ago in an order entered on May 11, 2026, the Court will continue this hearing.
In advance of the continued hearing, the parties shall submit a JOINT status report apprising the Court of anticipated next steps or whether additional time is necessary.
Further Hearing
A further hearing on this matter is SET for August 13, 2026.
The Hearing on Motion - Other TO STAY DISSOLUTION OF DEFENDNANT LOCKBOX ESCAPES LLC AND APPOINTMENT OF A RECIVVER, AND ORDER BUYOUT PURSUANT TO CORP. CODE § 17707.03(C); filed by Monica Schafer (Defendant) CRS# 142652803645 scheduled for 03/27/2026 is continued to 08/13/2026 at 11:00 AM in Department 520 at Hayward Hall of Justice.
NOTICE: This tentative ruling will automatically become the courts final order on June 18, 2026 unless, by no later than 4:00 P.M. on June 17, 2026, a party to the action notifies BOTH: 1) the court by emailing Dept520@alameda.courts.ca.gov; AND 2) all opposing counsel or selfrepresented parties (by telephone or email) that the party is contesting this tentative ruling.
The subject line (RE:) of the email must state: Request for CONTESTED HEARING: [the case name], [number]. When a party emails to contest a tentative ruling, the party must identify the specific holding(s) within the ruling they wish to contest via oral argument. 26CV164744: PALTSEVA vs SCHAFER, et al. 06/17/2026 Hearing on Motion - Other TO STAY DISSOLUTION OF DEFENDNANT LOCKBOX ESCAPES LLC AND APPOINTMENT OF A RECIVVER, AND ORDER BUYOUT PURSUANT TO
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
A party who wants a record of the proceedings must engage a private court reporter. (Local Rule 3.95.) Any privately retained court reporter must also participate via video conference. Their email must be provided to the court at the time the Notice of Contest is emailed.
ALL CONTESTED LAW AND MOTION HEARINGS ARE CONDUCTED VIA REMOTE VIDEO unless an in person appearance is required by the court. Invitations to participate in the video proceeding will be sent by the court upon receipt of timely notice of contest. A party may give email notice that they will appear in court in person for the hearing, however all other counsel/parties and the JUDGE MAY APPEAR REMOTELY.