Demurrer to Amended Cross-Complaint; Case Management Conference
# Case Name 1 Baker & McKenzie LLP vs. Shapiro
2025-01523850 1. Demurrer to Amended Cross-Complaint 2. Case Management Conference
Continued to 10/05/2026 2 Delongchamps vs. Ford Motor Company
2025-01516107 1. Demurrer to Complaint 2. Case Management Conference
Off calendar as moot. First Amended Complaint timely filed 6/2/26. Case Management Conference continued to 7/20/2026 at 9:00 AM. 3 Haines vs. ARC Investments
2024-01438343 Demurrer to Amended Complaint / Motion to Strike Portions Of Complaint
Defendant ARC Investments’ demurrer to the second amended complaint (“SAC”) of plaintiff Cliff Haines is sustained with 20 days leave to amend. [ROA ## 123, 108]
Defendant’s motion to strike portions of the SAC is therefore moot.
Defendant’s request for judicial notice is granted. [ROA #119.] Further, on its own motion and with this notice to the parties, the court will take judicial notice of Plaintiff’s motion to vacate [Orange County Superior Court case no. 2024-01413277, ROA #37] in the prior action and the court’s denial. [Id., ROA #47.] Scott v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 743, 752.
Facts This is an action by a self-represented plaintiff for damages suffered by the loss of a mobile home slot and sale of the mobile home. [Complaint (ROA #1); FAC (ROA #47); SAC (ROA #108).]
Int his case, Plaintiff seeks recovery for fraud, coercion, and economic duress by Defendants that fraudulently induced Plaintiff to dismiss his prior lawsuit on September19. 2024. depriving him of a fair hearing on the merits.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”