Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Southlake Specialty Insurance Company to Comply With Subpoena
As a result of plaintiff’s stipulation, defendant’s motion is denied. The defendant has failed to show that exceptional circumstances exist to justify a neuropsychological examination.
4. S-CV-0053572 Acquaye, Deandre v. Singh, Palwinder
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Southlake Specialty Insurance Company to Comply With Subpoena
No objection was made to the subject subpoena. No motion was made to quash the subpoena or to seek a protective order. Plaintiff’s motion is granted. The subject documents shall be produced by July 13, 2026. Sanctions in the amount of $1,050 shall be paid by Southlake Specialty Insurance Company by July 13, 2026.
5. S-CV-0055117 Harris v. Safeway, Inc.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses
Date reserved, but no motion filed. The hearing is dropped from calendar.
6. S-PR-0013051 In Re Estate of Shackelford
Motion to Compel Production Pursuant to Subpoena
This motion has been continued to September 14, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 2. Pending the hearing, the Placer County Sheriff’s Office is ordered to preserve the evidence that is requested in the subpoena which is the subject of the motion.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”