DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME SANTA CRUZ VS J. B. CVRI2404726 MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE HUNT TRANSPORT, INC. Tentative Ruling: Defendant’s UNOPPOSED motion to consolidate is granted. This instant case, CVRI2404726, will be the lead case.
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME JOINDER TO AMAZON SANTA CRUZ VS J. B. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO CVRI2404726 HUNT TRANSPORT, INC. CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE AND ALL ATTENDANT DATES Tentative Ruling: Hearing is vacated as moot.
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HERRERA VS FCA US DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF' S
LLC COMPLAINT Tentative Ruling: On May 28, 2026, Plaintiffs dismissed their sixth cause of action and prayer for punitive damages, without prejudice. Accordingly, the demurrer and motion to strike are moot.
4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CITY OF CORONA VS OBJECTIONS REGARDING RIGHT CERCA TROVA RIC2002846 TO TAKE RESTAURANT GROUP HOLDINGS INC Tentative Ruling: Defendants C.P.I. Properties, LP and Citizens Business Bank’s Objection to 2025 Resolution is sustained.
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE:
Defendants request judicial notice of several documents filed in this action. These documents may be judicially noticed pursuant to Cal. Evid. Code §452(d), which permits judicial notice of court records. However, “although the existence of a document may be judicially noticeable, the truth of statements contained in the document and its proper interpretation are not subject to judicial notice if those matters are reasonably disputable.” (Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Fremont General Corp. (2007) 148 Cal. App. 4th 97, 113.) The request is granted.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”