Motion to compel arbitration
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME ALFARO VS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY CVRI2501545 SCHOOLHOUSE APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION MANUFACTURING, LLC SETTLEMENT Tentative Ruling: Appearances requested to discuss:
1. Unclear about when notice was sent to the LWDA—Wheeler Declaration states 3/12/25, but class notice says 1/14/25.
2. Confirm correct amount of payment to LWDA—Wheeler declaration ¶ 36 says $16,500, but 65% is %16,250 (and ¶ 62 says “seventy-five percent (65%).
3. Revise notice to add the full title and date of filing of the document to which the settlement agreement is attached (Declaration of Scott Ernest Wheeler in Support of Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement filed April 2, 2026).
4. Revise objection form to correct defendant’s name (at bottom of page 1, defendant is listed as Advanced Flow Engineering, not Schoolhouse Manufacturing) and it appears there are two objection forms (B and C to the notice).
5. Correct address for Phoenix—class notice refers to Orange, CA but exclusion and objection forms refer to Tustin. Zip code 92863 is Orange.
6. Administrator to redact any SSNs on forms filed with motion for final approval.
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HARPER VS METROPRO MOTION TO COMPEL CVRI2504458 ROAD SERVICES, INC. ARBITRATION Tentative Ruling: Appearances requested to discuss whether any supplemental opposition was filed; does not appear to have been.
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HARPER VS METROPRO MOTION TO COMPEL
ROAD SERVICES, INC. ARBITRATION Tentative Ruling: See related tentative ruling.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”