DecisionDepot
California legal research
All attorneys

PRO SE

Firm unspecified · 16 rulings ingested

First seen May 29, 2026 · last seen Aug 6, 2026

Ruling distribution
16
rulings
Win rate (Granted ÷ G+D)
50%
Plaintiff vs Defendant
7 P · 9 D

Motion types — outcome distribution

Motion typeTotalGrantedDeniedGrant rate
Motion for Sanctions41025%
Other41325%
Demurrer4000%
Motion to Quash3010%
Petition21050%
Motion to Compel Discovery110100%
Motion for Attorney Fees110100%
Motion to Compel Further Responses1000%
Motion to Strike1000%

Recent rulings (16)

CaseCountyJudgeRulingIndexedHearing
EMMA JESSICA TORGERSON VS. META PLATFORMS, INC.
25-CIV-09890
sanmateoHonorable Mark A. McCannonCONTINUEDAug 6, 2026Aug 6, 2026
CLAUDIO S. NICOLOSI VS. CHRISTINA NICOLOSI, ET AL
26-UDL-00477
sanmateoHonorable Mark A. McCannonCONTINUEDAug 6, 2026Aug 6, 2026
KEVIN RAMOS VS. SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT, ET AL.
25-CIV-00601
sanmateoNicole S. HealyCONTINUEDJul 22, 2026Jul 22, 2026
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS. RENALIN SALVADICO
25-CLJ-06986
sanmateoNicole S. HealyDENIED without prejudiceJul 22, 2026Jul 22, 2026
BART D. KIMBER VS. JOE TORRES, ET AL
25-CIV-09320
sanmateoMark A. McCannonGRANTEDJul 16, 2026Jul 16, 2026
FRANK KAUL VS. AFONSO INFANTE, ET AL
25-CIV-06878
sanmateoMark A. McCannonDemurrer SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND; Sanctions DENIEDJul 16, 2026Jul 16, 2026
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS. INAS S SHAABAN
25-CLJ-00488
sanmateoMark A. McCannonDENIEDJul 16, 2026Jul 16, 2026
DAWN CALVERT VS. NEWELL’S COCKTAIL LOUNGE
23-CIV-05077
sanmateoMark A. McCannonCONTINUEDJul 16, 2026Jul 16, 2026
473-475 GRAND AVE LLC VS. ARTURO PEREZ, ET AL
26-UDL-00079
sanmateoMark A. McCannonDENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICEJul 16, 2026Jul 16, 2026
BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY VS. ARMANDO VEGA PACHECO, ET AL
26-UDL-00208
sanmateoMark A. McCannonGRANTEDJun 10, 2026Jun 4, 2026
ROBERT M. LINDBLAD VS. VALERO MARKETING AND SUPPLY COMPANY, ET AL
23-CIV-00283
sanmateoMark A. McCannonMOOTJun 10, 2026Jun 4, 2026
DOROTEA VIDOVIC VS. SEQUOIA UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
26-CIV-01306
sanmateoMark A. McCannonGRANTEDJun 10, 2026Jun 4, 2026
CLAUDIO S. NICOLOSI VS. CHRISTINA NICOLOSI, ET AL
26-UDL-00477
sanmateoMark A. McCannonCONTINUEDJun 10, 2026Jun 4, 2026
DANIEL MAUNG VS. MARISSA GUILLERMO
25-UDL-01396
sanmateoMICHAEL L. MAUGRANTED in part for $12,733.00May 27, 2026May 29, 2026
SUNG IL KWOK VS. CITY OF DALY CITY, ET AL
26-CIV-01282
sanmateoMICHAEL L. MAUNo tentative ruling, parties to appear in-person for this evidentiary hearing.May 27, 2026May 29, 2026
THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. CHRISTOPHER J. RUSSELL
25-UDL-01389
sanmateoMICHAEL L. MAUDENIEDMay 27, 2026May 29, 2026

Descriptive only — name normalization is imperfect (different counties may spell the same attorney differently). Verify before relying on counts.

Frequently asked questions

What is PRO SE's record in California Superior Court?+

According to DecisionDepot's index of California Superior Court tentative rulings, PRO SE appears in 16 indexed rulings with a 50% grant rate on contested motions. Data is drawn from publicly posted tentative rulings and may not reflect all matters.

Which California courts does PRO SE appear in?+

Based on indexed tentative rulings, PRO SE has appeared in 1 county: SANMATEO. The full list with case counts appears on this profile page.